Showing posts with label Pharmaceutical Jurisprudence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pharmaceutical Jurisprudence. Show all posts

Friday, September 8, 2023

The Pharmacy Act of 1948: An Overview

Pharmacy Act of 1948

The Pharmacy Act of 1948: An Overview

Introduction and Purpose:

Before India gained independence, there were no regulations governing the practice of pharmacy. The Drug Enquiry Committee recognized the need for individuals involved in compounding and dispensing medicines to have proper education and qualifications. Similarly, the Health Survey and Development Committee made similar recommendations. As a result, the Pharmacy Act of 1948 was enacted in March 1948.

The primary objective of the Pharmacy Act of 1948 is to regulate the pharmacy profession and elevate its status in India. To achieve this goal, the Act established the Pharmacy Council of India, also known as the Central Council. This council is responsible for setting educational standards and regulations for the Diploma Course in Pharmacy through Education Regulations. Additionally, the Act provides for the formation of State Pharmacy Councils, which register pharmacists and oversee their professional activities.

Definitions:

1. Central Council: Refers to the Pharmacy Council of India.

2. Central Register: The registry of pharmacists maintained by the Central Council.

3. Medical Practitioner: Defined as an individual who holds qualifications specified under the Indian Medical Degrees Act of 1916 or the Indian Medical Council Act of 1956, or is registered or eligible for registration in a medical register of a state for practicing modern scientific medicine. This also includes individuals engaged in veterinary medicine with approved qualifications.

4. Registered Pharmacist: An individual whose name is currently listed in the pharmacist registry of the state where they reside or practice pharmacy.

5. Displaced Person: Refers to individuals who left their place of residence due to the partition of India and Pakistan, civil disturbances, or fear of such disturbances in specific areas.

6. Repatriate: A person of Indian origin who left their place of residence in Burma, Sri Lanka, Uganda, or other countries due to civil disturbances and has since resided in India.

7. University Grants Commission: Denotes the University Grants Commission established under the University Grants Commission Act of 1956.

8. Indian University: Refers to universities defined under the University Grants Commission Act of 1956, including institutions specified by the Central Government through official notification.

Pharmacy Council of India: constitution

The Pharmacy Act of 1948 establishes the Central Council, also known as the Pharmacy Council of India, under section 3 of chapter 1. The council comprises the following members:

(a) Six members, including at least one teacher in Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Pharmacy, Pharmacology, and Pharmacognosy, elected by the University Grants Commission from Indian university or college staff offering pharmacy degree or diploma programs.
(b) Six members nominated by the Central Government, with at least four possessing pharmacy degrees or diplomas and actively practicing pharmacy or pharmaceutical chemistry.
(c) One member elected by the Medical Council of India from their members.
(d) Representatives from the UGC and the All India Council for Technical Education.
(e) One member from each state, elected by their respective State Councils, who must be a registered pharmacist (Note: As per the Pharmacy Amendment Act of 1976, one member is nominated by the Government of each union territory, eligible for registration under section 31).
(f) One member from each state, nominated by the State Government, who must be a registered pharmacist.

Ex-officio members include:
(g) Director General of Health Services.
(h) Drug Controller of India.
(i) Director of the Central Drugs Laboratory.

Functions of Pharmacy Council of India (PCI):

The Central Council, or PCI, has several key functions:

  1. Prescribing minimum educational standards for pharmacist qualification.
  2. Regulating these minimum educational standards by appointing inspectors to evaluate institutions offering pharmacy education.
  3. Recognizing qualifications from regions outside the scope of the Pharmacy Act of 1948 for the purpose of registration.
  4. Maintaining a central register of pharmacists.
  5. Undertaking any other functions necessary for advancing the objectives of the Pharmacy Act of 1948.
  6. 3. Recognizing qualifications from regions outside the scope of the Pharmacy Act of 1948 for the purpose of registration.

Tuesday, September 5, 2023

Pharmacist in relation to his Trade & Profession. Pharmacist Oath

Pharmacist in relation to his Trade & Profession. Pharmacist Oath

Pharmacist in relation to his Trade & Profession. Pharmacist Oath


 Price Structure:

  1. Pharmacists must ensure that the prices of drugs and medicinal preparations charged to customers are reasonable, inclusive of dispensing and compounding charges, and do not overly burden the purchaser.

 Fair Trade Practices:

  1. Pharmacists should refrain from engaging in unhealthy competition or cut-throat tactics aimed at capturing the business of fellow pharmacists. This includes avoiding practices like offering reduced prices, gifts, prizes, etc.
  2. It is prohibited to copy or imitate trade marks, labels, symbols, or any other signs associated with other pharmacists. All drugs and ingredients must be sourced from reputable suppliers.

 Hawking of Drugs:

  1. Pharmacists should not engage in hawking drugs and medicines or attempt to collect orders from door to door.
  2. Self-servicing methods in the pharmacy or drug stores should not be allowed, as they may encourage self-medication, which is both undesirable and potentially dangerous.

 Advertisement and Display: 

  1. There should be no display or advertisement on the premises, in newspapers, or elsewhere that makes misleading or exaggerated statements or claims about the pharmacy's abilities and services. This includes guarantees of therapeutic efficacy, offers to refund money paid, appeals to fear, and the use of the word 'cure' in reference to ailments or symptoms of ill-health.

 Pharmacists in Relation to the Medical Profession:

  1. Pharmacists should never engage in the practice of medicine, including diagnosing diseases and prescribing medicines. However, in cases of accidents or emergencies, they may provide first aid services.
  2. Recommending a particular medical practitioner should only be done when specifically asked for by a customer.
  3. Pharmacists should avoid entering into secret agreements with medical professionals, physicians, dentists, or veterinary surgeons to offer them commissions or gifts in exchange for recommending their dispensary or drug store. Such underhand arrangements with any physician are strictly prohibited.
  4. Pharmacists serve as a bridge between the medical profession and the public. They should stay updated on developments in pharmacy and related fields, becoming experts in their domain to provide advice to physicians on pharmaceutical matters and educate the public on maintaining their health.
  5. Discussions about physician's prescriptions with customers and the disclosure of prescription compositions should be avoided.

 Pharmacists in Relation to Their Profession:

  1. Pharmacists must abide by the law and ethical principles to uphold the standards of their profession.
  2. Providing help and cooperation to fellow pharmacists in emergencies and legitimate situations is encouraged.
  3. Pharmacists should actively work to eliminate undesirable, corrupt, or dishonest conduct within their profession to maintain its reputable status in society.
  4. A thorough understanding of state and national laws related to food, drugs, pharmacy education, health, and other relevant matters is essential.
  5. Staying updated on professional matters and engaging with pharmaceutical organizations with compatible ethical values is important.
  6. Pharmacists should avoid any actions that may bring discredit to their profession or themselves.

 Pharmacist’s Oath-

The Pharmacist's Oath, also known as the Oath of a Pharmacist, is a solemn pledge that pharmacists often take upon graduating from pharmacy school or as a commitment to their profession. The specific wording of the oath may vary among institutions and countries, but the underlying principles and values are typically consistent. Here's a common version of the Pharmacist's Oath:

"I promise to devote myself to a lifetime of service to others through the profession of pharmacy. In fulfilling this vow:

I will consider the welfare of humanity and relief of suffering my primary concerns.

I will apply my knowledge, experience, and skills to the best of my ability to assure optimal outcomes for my patients.

I will respect and protect all personal and health information entrusted to me.

I will accept the lifelong obligation to improve my professional knowledge and competence.

I will hold myself and my colleagues to the highest principles of our profession's moral, ethical, and legal conduct.

I will embrace and advocate changes that improve patient care.

I will utilize my knowledge, skills, experiences, and values to prepare the next generation of pharmacists.

I take these vows voluntarily with the full realization of the responsibility with which I am entrusted by the public."

 

Pharmacists take this oath as a commitment to their patients, their profession, and the ethical practice of pharmacy. It underscores the importance of patient welfare, continuous learning, and ethical conduct in the practice of pharmacy.

Friday, September 1, 2023

ETHICS IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY

ETHICS IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY

ETHICS IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY

Ethics, the study of moral principles and duties, plays a pivotal role in shaping behavior within the pharmaceutical field. It involves a system of principles or guidelines designed to steer the conduct of specific groups, such as professionals in the industry. The development of a Code of Ethics serves as an indicator of the maturation and expansion of moral awareness.

Distinguishing between Ethics and Law, one can note that Law encompasses the rules binding all individuals in a society, while Ethics pertains to regulations established by a profession to govern its members' actions and uphold standards.

A paramount distinction lies in the enforcement mechanisms for these rules. Legal violations result in penalties like fines or imprisonment. In contrast, breaches of ethical standards can lead to professional privileges being revoked. Professional ethical codes often establish conduct standards that differ from legal norms. While the law might prevent causing harm, it cannot compel individuals to aid others in times of need—a domain inherent to ethical principles.

Illustrating this contrast, the Drugs and Cosmetic Act and Rules inhibit the sale of substandard drugs by pharmacists, yet fail to prevent the sale of medications at prices lower than competitors, which is deemed unethical. Such behaviors, beyond the scope of legal frameworks, find resolution in codes of ethics. For instance, a pharmacist should not manage a medical store while intoxicated—a tenet of ethical conduct. This underscores that a lack of ethics renders an individual uncivilized even within a civilized society.

 Difference Between Law and Ethics

  1. 1. Nature and Origin:
  • Law: Law consists of a set of rules and regulations that are established and enforced by a governing authority (such as a government). It is a formal system that is legally binding and enforced through the legal system.
  • Ethics: Ethics refers to a set of moral principles and values that guide human behavior. It is based on individual or collective beliefs about what is right and wrong. Ethics is not enforced by a governing body but relies on personal or societal values. 
  1. Source of Authority:
  • Law: Laws are enacted by legislative bodies or other authoritative entities within a legal system. They carry the force of the government and are backed by legal consequences.
  • Ethics: Ethics are derived from cultural, religious, philosophical, or personal beliefs. They are not enforced by legal authorities but rather shape personal character and social norms. 
  1. Enforcement:
  • Law: Violations of laws can result in legal consequences, such as fines, imprisonment, or other penalties, imposed by the legal system.
  • Ethics: Violations of ethical principles may result in social consequences, damage to reputation, loss of trust, and impact on personal or professional relationships, but not legal penalties. 
  1. Universality:
  • Law: Laws are often universally applicable within a specific jurisdiction, applying to all individuals within that jurisdiction equally.
  • Ethics: Ethical principles can vary significantly based on cultural, religious, and individual perspectives. What is considered ethical in one context might not be in another. 
  1.  Flexibility:
  • Law: Laws are relatively rigid and may take time to change or adapt to evolving societal norms.
  • Ethics: Ethical principles are more flexible and can evolve over time as societies change and progress. 
  1. Scope:
  • Law: Laws cover a wide range of areas, including criminal, civil, commercial, and administrative matters, and often focus on minimum acceptable standards of behavior.
  • Ethics: Ethics can cover a broader range of human actions and decisions, including matters not explicitly addressed by laws. They often reflect higher standards of conduct beyond what is legally required. 
  1. Compulsory vs. Voluntary:
  • Law: Compliance with laws is mandatory and legally binding for all individuals within the jurisdiction, irrespective of personal beliefs.
  • Ethics: Adherence to ethical principles is voluntary and based on personal or collective beliefs about what is right. It allows for individual discretion in making ethical choices. 
  1. Consequences:
  • Law: Violating laws can result in formal legal actions and penalties, such as fines or imprisonment.
  • Ethics: Violating ethical principles can lead to social censure, damaged relationships, loss of trust, and reputational harm.

In summary, while both law and ethics guide human behavior and influence decision-making, they differ in their sources of authority, enforcement mechanisms, universality, and flexibility. Law is enforced by legal authorities and carries formal consequences, while ethics are based on moral principles and voluntary adherence to social norms.

 PHARMACEUTICAL CODE OF ETHICS

Developing Professional Competence and Integrity

Education in a profession necessitates competence within that field, grounded in an understanding of its societal context. Practitioners must blend professional skill with social awareness, as competence and ethical behavior are pillars of any profession's practice. Ethical codes are the lifeblood of professions, shaping their identity and existence.

Within the pharmaceutical realm, a collective responsibility exists to ensure that aspiring pharmacists comprehend and adhere to professional conduct standards. Deviating from these standards imperils the integrity of the pharmacy profession, which requires knowledge, skill, and integrity. This profession collaborates with medicine to preserve public health, dispensing remedies that may be curative or hazardous. Thus, a shared ethical foundation is vital in interactions among pharmacists, the medical fraternity, and the public.

 UPHOLDING PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

 Ensuring Quality Service and Social Responsibility

Establishing standards of professional conduct within pharmacy serves the public interest, guaranteeing the provision of effective pharmaceutical services. These standards extend beyond mere service provision; they encompass conscientiousness in acts and omissions. Pharmacists, as custodians of health, must maintain a strong societal commitment and a spirit of service, recognizing their responsibility alongside medical professionals in safeguarding public well-being.

Collaboration and mutual aid among pharmacists are paramount, as is shouldering professional obligations for the greater societal good.

 PHARMACISTS AND THEIR ROLE

 Delivering Pharmaceutical Services with Integrity

  1. Pharmacists must offer comprehensive pharmaceutical services promptly, including emergency supplies.
  2. Services that includes over the counter medicines without any dalay.

 Managing Pharmacies

  1. Every pharmacy should be overseen by a qualified pharmacist, who ensures proper conduct and adherence to standards.
  2. Pharmacy layout must prevent accidental contamination during preparation, dispensing, and supply.
  3. Pharmacy premises should reflect professionalism and highlight the establishment's dedication to pharmaceutical practice.

 Handling Prescriptions

  1. Pharmacists should avoid discussing prescription merits and flaws with patients or others.
  2. Their expression should remain neutral after receiving prescriptions to uphold patients' trust in prescribers.
  3. Altering prescriptions requires prescriber consent, except in emergencies; errors warrant prescriber correction or approval without tarnishing their reputation.
  4. Recommending prescribers should occur only upon request.

 Managing Drugs and Ingredients

  1. Precise measurement of ingredients is crucial when dispensing prescriptions.
  2. Exclusive use of drugs and medicinal products of standardized quality is a must.
  3. Avoid supplying drugs with potential for addiction or abuse unless required for valid medical purposes.

 Providing Practical Training

  1. Instructors must ensure trainees acquire necessary skills during practical training.
  2. Certification should be granted post completion of requisite training and adequate knowledge acquisition.

By adhering to these ethical guidelines, pharmacists not only uphold their profession but also contribute to the well-being of society they serve.

 

Wednesday, August 30, 2023

HEALTH SURVEY AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

HEALTH SURVEY AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, HATHI COMMITTEE AND MUDALIAR COMMITTEE

HEALTH SURVEY AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE



HEALTH SURVEY AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE:

 In October 1943, the Government of India took the initiative to establish the Health Survey and Development Committee, placing Sir Joseph Bhore at its helm as the chairman. The central focus of this committee was the meticulous examination of the healthcare organization infrastructure inherited from the British India era. In pursuit of this, it directed its efforts towards generating comprehensive recommendations aimed at propelling developmental strides in the field.

The pivotal recommendations proffered by the Health Survey and Development Committee encompassed:

  1. The inception of a Central Drug Laboratory (CDL).
  2. The rigorous enforcement and application of the Drug Act of 1940 across the expanse of the nation.
  3. The creation of both the All India Pharmaceutical Council and Provincial Pharmaceutical Council entities, tasked with the designation of representatives hailing from the pharmaceutical trade, pharmacy education, and other pharmaceutical sectors.

Further noteworthy propositions consisted of:

  1. The issuance of comprehensive guidelines pertinent to pharmacist registration within India.
  2. The provision of overhauled academic curricula tailored to licensed pharmacists, graduate pharmacists, and pharmaceutical technologists, designed to align with their respective roles within the profession.
  3. The establishment of a specialized committee entrusted with the examination of the nation's exigencies concerning drugs and other fundamental medical requisites.
  4. The delineation of strategies for the enforcement of discipline within the practice and profession of pharmacy.
  5. The engagement of proficient pharmacists across diverse domains of the pharmacy profession, aimed at the stringent adherence to Pharmaceutical Legislation.
  6. The elevation of professional benchmarks, thereby erecting safeguards to protect the field from the encroachment of unskilled individuals. 

HATHI COMMITTEE:

The Jaisukhlal Hathi Committee, an appointment by the Indian government, was entrusted with the oversight of diverse facets of the Indian drug industry, underpinning its burgeoning growth. Among the key objectives delineated for the committee were:

  1. The examination of industry progression and its current status.
  2. The formulation of measures that would precipitate the ascendancy of the public sector in the realm of basic drug manufacturing, formulations, and research and development.

Further pivotal goals comprised:

  1. The formulation of strategies to buttress the expansion of the drug industry, with a particular emphasis on the Indian and small-scale industrial sectors.
  2. A critical assessment of mechanisms facilitating the infusion of novel technologies into the industry, accompanied by necessary recommendations.
  3. The inception of strategies promoting effective quality control for drugs and extending support to small-scale units.

Further salient aspects encompassed:

  1. A meticulous appraisal of steps aimed at reducing consumer costs, coupled with recommendations to foster the rationalization of prices pertaining to essential drugs and formulations.
  2. The formulation of strategies conducive to the provision of essential drugs and commonplace household remedies to the general public, especially within rural areas.
  3. Recommendations concerning institutional frameworks and other modalities aimed at ensuring an equitable distribution of fundamental drugs and raw materials, particularly within the small-scale industrial milieu.

 

The synopsis of recommendations presented within the Hathi Committee report unveiled:

  1. Approximately 20% of the aggregate sales in the realm of drugs and pharmaceuticals were undertaken by small-scale firms and multinational entities across the globe, aligning with a pattern discerned by the Hathi Committee.
  2. The viability of larger units within the modern pharmaceutical sector was inextricably linked with their capacity to innovate and launch new products, informed by research, and sustained by demand generation, facilitated through efficacious marketing techniques.

Inferences drawn from the Hathi Committee's endeavors revealed:

  1. A notable upswing in the pharmaceutical industry's growth over the past 15 years, evident in terms of product diversification and pricing policies.
  2. A continuous imperative for the assessment and enhancement of packaging methodologies and materials to establish fitting packaging standards.
  3. Advocacy for increased emphasis on standardization and cost-efficiency of packaging materials, all the while upholding the paramount importance of consumer protection.

The committee underscored:

  1. The necessity of regular reporting on production, inventory, costs, sales, profitability, and more to facilitate swift and efficient government action.
  2. The urgency of instituting a robust and sustained monitoring framework within the industry to accomplish pivotal objectives.

Furthermore, the committee advanced a substitute proposal wherein a profit ceiling of 10-12.5% post-tax on net worth, specifically paid-up capital, was posited as the norm. It also identified 13 generic drugs exempted from price regulation. Concerning returns on investment for bulk drug production, the committee endorsed a post-tax return rate of 12-14% on paid-up capital alongside reserves, serving as the foundational principle for price fixation.

 

MUDALIAR COMMITTEE:

 The Mudaliar Committee, initiated by the Government of India in 1961, was tasked with evaluating the advancements in medical relief and public health subsequent to the Bhore Committee's findings. This committee also played an instrumental role in shaping guidelines and proposals for integration into the ensuing Five Year Plans. The tenets established by the committee included:

 

  1. The establishment of a tiered pricing structure for hospital services, with provisions excluding indigent patients.
  2. Advocacy for the expansion of both the Employees State Insurance Scheme and the Central Government Health Scheme to encompass a broader spectrum of the populace.

Moreover, the Mudaliar Committee urged adherence to Bhore Committee references with regards to the implementation of primary health center initiatives. It endorsed the assumption of routine medical, surgical, obstetrical, and gynecological responsibilities by taluka hospitals, while district hospitals assumed the mantle of providing medical care and specialized services spanning medicine (including chest and heart ailments), surgery, obstetrics, gynecology, ENT, ophthalmology, pediatrics, orthopedics, dentistry, and venereal diseases. Several district hospitals were also earmarked for hosting teaching hospitals to solicit expert advice and assistance for investigations, diagnoses, and treatment protocols.

The committee emphasized:

  1. The necessity for blood bank services in every district and teaching hospital.
  2. The segregation of outpatient and inpatient departments via separate entrances.
  3. The imperative for state-level establishments such as children's hospitals, maternity hospitals, cancer hospitals, leprosy hospitals, and T.B. hospitals.
  4. The proposal for a state-level ophthalmic hospital furnished with 300-500 beds, alongside fully-equipped and staffed dental clinics in each district.

The Mudaliar Committee delved into the intricacies of public health challenges, extending recommendations to catalyze the evolution of both curative and preventive healthcare services. It asserted the universal need for the presence of hospitals and dispensaries to extend solace to ailing patients. It upheld the view that hospitals transiently serve as sanctuaries for patients, necessitating harmonized efforts from hospital authorities and government bodies to foster a conducive healing environment.

In this pursuit, the committee underlined the vital role played by infrastructure, equipment, and skill sets in curative services. However, it equally championed the significance of compassionate care, welfare facilities, and individualized attention, catering to the diverse needs of patients rooted in their social contexts and personality traits. The committee passionately advocated against preferential treatment based on affluence or political influence, stressing the need for equity within healthcare settings.

Tuesday, August 29, 2023

Scope and Objectives of Pharmaceutical Legislation

Scope and Objectives of Pharmaceutical Legislation

Scope and Objectives of Pharmaceutical Legislation

Scope and Objectives

The inception of the Drug Bill occurred in 1040 within the Legislative Assembly. After a thorough review by the Select Committee, the Drug Bill of 1940 successfully secured passage. This legislative transition led to the establishment of the Drug Act 1940, which came into effect seven years later in 1947. Over the years, the Drug Act underwent multiple amendments, culminating in its current iteration that encompasses regulations spanning Drugs, Cosmetics, as well as Ayurvedic, Unani, and Homoeopathic medicines.

The contemporary Drugs and Cosmetics Act represents an enhanced and evolved rendition of the original Drug Act from 1940. The principal objective driving this legislation is the meticulous oversight of Drug and Cosmetics importation, manufacturing, distribution, and sales. In line with this, the Central Government has formulated a comprehensive set of regulations, titled "The Drugs and Cosmetics Rules of 1946," which govern the production, distribution, and sales of drugs and cosmetics in India. These statutes and rules are subject to periodic revisions, ensuring their relevance and effectiveness.

Legislative Developments in Pharmacy Regulation in India

Following India's attainment of independence in 1947, a series of vital legislative measures were enacted in alignment with recommendations from the DEC (Drug Enquiry Committee). In 1948, the Pharmacy Act came into existence with the primary objective of effectively overseeing and regulating the pharmacy profession within India.

During the year 1954, the enactment of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act aimed to exert control over specific categories of drug-related advertisements and, concurrently, to prohibit advertisements promoting magic remedies.

The year 1955 witnessed the establishment of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, which facilitated the imposition and collection of excise duties on medicinal and toilet preparations incorporating substances like alcohol, opium, Indian hemp, or other narcotic drugs. The Central Government introduced corresponding regulations under this Act, recognized as the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duty) Rules of 1956.

Within the framework of the Essential Commodities Act of 1955, and in lieu of the Drug (Prices Control) Order of 1979, the Central Government formulated the Drug (Prices Control) Order of 1987, granting greater control over drug pricing and distribution.

In 1985, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act was enacted, which effectively replaced the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1930 and the Opium Act of 1878. The central aim of this legislation was to consolidate and amend existing laws pertaining to narcotic drugs. It also established stringent provisions for controlling and regulating operations linked to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. The accompanying Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Ordinance of 1988 supplemented this act.

 

Numerous other legislations, either directly or indirectly associated with the manufacture, distribution, and sale of drugs and pharmaceuticals in India, also deserve mention:

 

1. The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act of 1954 and its corresponding rules.

2. The Industries (Development and Regulation) Act of 1951.

3. The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act of 1946 and its rules.

4. The Industrial Disputes Act of 1947.

5. The Factory Act of 1948.

6. The Indian Patent and Design Act of 1970.

7. The Trade and Merchandise Marks Act of 1958.

8. The Epidemic Diseases Act of 1897.

9. Shops and Establishments Acts specific to respective states.

Monday, August 28, 2023

Pharmaceutical Legislation In India

 Pharmaceutical Legislation In India

Pharmaceutical Legislation In India

The Purpose of Pharmaceutical Legislation In India 

The purpose of Pharmaceutical Legislation is to guarantee that patients obtain medications that have been examined and assessed for both safety and effectiveness according to their intended purpose. This indicates that Pharmaceutical Legislation is closely linked to the well-being of the community.

 Historical Origin

In approximately 1811, a chemist's shop was established in India by Mr. Bathgate, who arrived in the country as part of the East India Company stationed in Calcutta. Progressing a century further, around 1910, this enterprise initiated the production of tinctures and spirits.

In a parallel vein, another business named Smith Stanistreet and Co. founded an apothecary shop in 1821, subsequently venturing into manufacturing in 1918. Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works, a modest factory, commenced operations in Calcutta in 1901 under the guidance of Acharya Prafulla Chandra Ray. Concurrently, in 1903, Professor T. K. Gajjar spearheaded the establishment of a small factory in Parel, which subsequently catalyzed the growth of additional pharmaceutical entities such as the Alembic Chemical Works Ltd. in Baroda. However, these undertakings proved inadequate to satisfy the healthcare needs of the Indian populace. During that era, the majority of medicinal products were imported from overseas, primarily the United Kingdom, France, and Germany.

The situation underwent transformation with the advent of the First World War. This period witnessed the importation of more affordable drugs from foreign sources, alongside escalating demands for domestically produced medications. Indigenous and foreign companies engaged in competition, striving to manufacture more economical alternatives to imported drugs. Consequently, this scenario bred cutthroat competition, flooding the Indian market with substandard, low-quality, and even hazardous drugs. Responding to this concern, the public impelled the government to address the alarming state of the pharmaceutical trade and industry, urging the implementation of effective regulations governing the import, production, distribution, and sale of drugs.

Although the Opium Act of 1878, the Pia Act of 1919, and the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1930 were already in place, they proved insufficient in comprehensively regulating the chaotic and undesirable conditions prevailing at the time. Hence, as the 20th century commenced, the pharmacy profession lacked substantial legal oversight. As the pharmaceutical sector expanded rapidly and the market burgeoned, the necessity for more comprehensive legislation became evident. Thus, with the intent of formulating all-encompassing regulations, the Indian government embarked on a mission to develop comprehensive legislation.

An 'Investigative Committee on Pharmaceuticals' was established in 1931, led by Lt. Col. R. N. Chopra (referred to as the Chopra Committee or D. E. C.). The primary purpose of this committee was to conduct inquiries and provide suggestions to effectively oversee the production, importation, distribution, and vending of drugs, prioritizing public health. The committee's recommendations are outlined as follows:

Recommendations

In their comprehensive report consisting of approximately 90 proposals, the following notable recommendations were made:

1. The formation of a Central Pharmacy Council and Provincial Pharmacy Councils was suggested, entrusted with the responsibility of supervising the training and education of professionals within the pharmaceutical sector. These councils would curate a registry featuring the names and details of Registered Pharmacists.

2. The Drugs Enquiry Committee emphasized the establishment of centralized drug control bodies at the national level, with corresponding branches in each state to regulate pharmaceutical operations.

3. The committee also advised the establishment of a well-equipped Central Drug Laboratory (CDL), staffed by proficient personnel and experts, to ensure the efficient functioning of the Drug Control Department. Smaller laboratories were advised to function under the guidance of the Central Drug Laboratory.

Due to the onset of World War II in 1939, the implementation of legislation based on the Drugs Enquiry Committee's recommendations faced delays, despite being deemed urgent by the Indian Government. This prompted increased public demand and pressure for the recommendations to be executed.

Eventually, an 'Import of Drugs Bill' was introduced in the Legislative Assembly in 1937, focusing on the regulation of drug imports. The Government chose to refer the Bill to a Select Committee. However, the Bill was limited in scope, addressing only the importation aspect while sidestepping the issues surrounding drug manufacture and sale. Consequently, the Select Committee advocated for a comprehensive legislative approach encompassing not only import controls but also the regulation of drug production, sale, and distribution within the nation.